Subscribe
Every September when the United Nations General Assembly meets to hear speeches from world leaders the Taoiseach of the day takes it as an opportunity to grand stand on the global stage in a way that only Irish politicians could. An Taoiseach Micheál Martin stood in front of the General Assembly on September 24th to tell us the world had failed Palestine while his home country reached a record homelessness figure of 17,885 people, of which 5,830 are children.
The irony of a leader criticising the world while his own country faces a multitude of problems which he has a duty to address yet remain unsolved is astonishing. It is for that reason the Irish United Nations governmental visit must be seen as naught but a vanity project. Alongside the Taoiseach, Foreign Minister Helen McEntee, Minister for Climate Daragh O’Brien, Junior Minister Neale Richmond and Junior Minister Timmy Dooley, were all present for the General Assembly.
The Irish priorities for this week of “high-level” meetings from which we can expect nothing to come from, were predictable picks from the Irish government’s speaking points. Multilateralism, climate change, Palestine, UN reform, AI, humanitarian crises and a campaign push for a seat on the UN Human Rights Council from 2027 til 2029. But none of this is in any way relevant to the compounding cost of living problems faced at home. The Irish public is routinely told that the government cannot provide for the needs of all citizens. However, that principle of frugality goes out the window annually as Irish politicians make pilgrimage to New York with an idealistic shopping list of global issues in hand.
Ireland is faced with an unfortunate set of circumstances whereby these sacred idols of Irish liberal politicians are effectively used as soapboxes for their personal beliefs and not the national interests of the State. Coupled with Ireland’s increasingly poor diplomatic image in the eyes of countries across the world, there is serious and active harm being perpetrated to the State by the very individuals tasked with leading it.
Despite Taoiseach Martin’s incessant virtue signalling over global conflicts from Ukraine to Palestine, his comments are characteristically formless, without weight or meaning . In fact, The Irish Times observed that Irish leaders’ statements at previous UN General Assemblies have not produced tangible results amidst the UN’s “crisis of relevancy.” When one of the country’s most liberal and left-leaning newspapers questions the value of this annual ritual the Taoiseach would do well to take note where public opinion has moved.
Yet the Taoiseach still told the Assembly that Ireland was resolutely committed to international cooperation. That comes amidst the Irish government’s own undermining of its commitment to multilateral structures as Martin moves to decouple the overseas deployment of the Irish Defence Forces from the authority of the United Nations Security Council. Naming America, China, and Russia as problematic veto users that could impede the deployment of Irish troops on peacekeeping missions, Dublin appears ignorant of the political hypocrisy and undiplomatic nature of its policy.
The Irish government is not known for its policy or analytical depth in decision-making. So it comes as no surprise that the Taoiseach stood on his soapbox to virtue signal in the chamber of an institution whose own Secretary-General António Guterres has warned faces “imminent financial collapse” because member states have failed to pay their dues. Its largest funder, the United States government, is now of the opinion that its funding of the UN is a waste of American tax dollars. Ireland may be stepping in to plug the gaps where USAID funding was culled, but for the funding of the United Nations, Ireland’s spending capacity will be unable to fix anything.
This is where the blindsidedness of Irish politicians is so damaging to the country’s reputation. If Ireland is seen as a country that is institutionally loyal to defund and ineffective organisations, the only conclusion that can be deduced is that is because the country itself is governed the same way. Though institutional loyalty can be a virtue, Ireland’s mistake is its committed obsession with an institution which cannot meet its own obligations, cannot enforce its resolutions, and after three rounds of voting has no clear favourite for the next Secretary-General decided upon.
The Taoiseach’s meeting with New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani further demonstrates that the real purpose of this official governmental trip was really political pageantry all along. According to The Irish Times, the two left-wing politicians hosted a bingo game, rode a train together, and gave the Mayor camera time to make vague statements supportive of Irish unity only a week after US President Donald Trump’s statement of support for unification.
The Taoiseach, perhaps looking for political points to score, chose to wade into a dispute between the Mayor and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu had accused Mamdani of supporting Hamas and made accusations of anti-semitism towards Mamdani and the far-left wing of the Democratic Party of which he is part of. The Taoiseach’s intercession calling on Netanyahu to “respect his mandate and not endeavour to undermine it” is irrelevant to the prorogatives of Irish foreign policy and the national interests of the country. And yet, predictably, the Taoiseach chose to waste his time pledging his support to foreign political figures.
Whatever a person’s opinion of New York City politics and Mayor Mamdani, Ireland’s head of government has no business refereeing a municipal controversy. The intervention is even harder to justify considering that it came over a week after the Taoiseach hosted President Donald Trump in Dublin. Ireland’s economic exposure to the United States is substantial. Unnecessary public commentary on American politics carries a potential risk, and it is Irish workers, not Irish ministers, who stand to lose most from any fallout.
At the end of the day, the substance behind Ireland’s political virtue signalling at the UN costs little and earns vain politicians a chance to raise applause in an international chamber to stroke their egos. Building homes, reforming the archaic planning permission system and confronting corruption at home is expensive, slow and oftentimes politically dangerous. So it should be seen as a natural development that Irish leaders choose to voice their ambitions for the world rather than those for their own country.
If Irish leaders took their country’s foreign policy seriously they would begin with protecting Ireland’s national interests with recognition of the conscientiousness with which small states must conduct their diplomatic operations. The Irish government should be soberly assessing the forums which deliver results and thoser which are merely global talking shops. The time of senior government officials should be valuable and committed to the interests of the State. For it to be used to communicate self-serving monologues as official State policy represents gross misconduct at the highest level. Ireland should be looking for what it can deliver on, serious tangible differences that the country can make through physical actions in the real world. The cerebral yet effete grandiose speeches touting the world as evil and heralding Ireland as a moral saviour must come to an end if Irish officials want to be taken seriously by their foreign counterparts.
The Taoiseach told the UN General Assembly that when the full truth about Gaza is known, “nobody will be able to say that we did not know.” The same is true of Martin’s disastrous stint as Taoiseach back home where homelessness continues to balloon right under his government’s lazeful watch.