Subscribe
Europe is not being governed. It is being administered.
The difference is not semantic. Governance implies choice, vision, debate. Administration is procedural. Bureaucratic. Indifferent to opposition. Europe today prefers the latter. It calls this neutrality, or competence, or rules-based order. But in practice, it means rule without accountability, and power without exposure.
The European Union is moving towards being no longer an alliance of nations pursuing shared goals, but rather an operating system. Self-updating, self-defending, self-justifying. Its prime virtue is that it cannot be turned off.
Its managers do not need to win arguments. They only need to enforce procedures and outcomes.
The Illusion of Impartial Rule
For many decades, the EU has sold itself as a rational alternative to democratic volatility. Technocracy, we are told, is not ideology. It is professionalisation. Decisions are made not by populists or parties but by people with expertise, data, qualifications.
The problem is that the outcomes always follow the same direction.
The European Central Bank sets monetary policy. It claims to follow inflation data. Yet its policies consistently favour asset holders over wage earners, banks over workers, integration over sovereignty. This is not a neutral outcome. It is an outcome which can only end in political volatility and the growth of radically different political movements, be they of the right or left.
The European Commission drafts regulations to fight climate change. It insists the science is settled. Yet the effects are absorbed by Irish farmers, Polish miners, Dutch fishermen, while multinational manufacturers and carbon credit speculators consolidate power. Again, this is not balance. It is stratification.
A genuine technocracy would be subject to review. A real expert class would be fired after failure. But in Brussels, failure is a qualification. There is no mechanism to replace those who impose error, because they were never elected in the first place.
Failure Without Cost
Consider the record. The euro project hollowed out southern economies, caused unlearnt economic booms, deepened German dependence on exports, and triggered a decade-long austerity cycle. The migration crisis fractured national coalitions, destabilised communities, and was never resolved. COVID procurement was bungled at every level.
But no resignations followed. No reversals. No public reckoning.
The European Court of Justice, the Commission, the ECB — these are not organs of democratic life. They are closed loops. They do not reflect opinion. They do not respond to election. They do not fear opposition. The appearance of unity is manufactured through a simple trick: policy is moved from parliaments to procedures. From politics to process.
And process, once established, becomes its own defence. It cannot be dismantled because it is no longer recognised as political. To question it is to be labelled backward, un-European, or far-right.
Rule Without Alternatives
The post-political fantasy of Europe is that all major decisions have already been made, and that the remaining work is merely implementation. Climate policy is settled. Monetary policy is scientific. Migration flows are inevitable. Economic globalisation is irreversible. Social progress is unidirectional.
There is no room for deviation. Only delay.
When national governments deviate, as Hungary has on culture, or Poland on judicial reform, or Slovakia on sanctions, the response is not negotiation. It is financial punishment. Brussels withholds funds. Legal proceedings are launched. Rule of law is invoked.
But the rule of law, in the EU context, no longer refers to basic legal principles. It means alignment with Commission preferences. It means conformity to structural norms. Disobedience is not treated as democratic disagreement. It is treated as a threat to order.
This is not federalism. It is conditional sovereignty. The nation remains on paper. But the substance of policy is extracted, uploaded, and made irreversible. It is not what the EU was initially designed to do, to be.
The Mechanism of Lock-In
There is a reason why the Green Deal, migration quotas, and digital surveillance infrastructure are all embedded through regulation, rather than ordinary legislation. Regulations bypass national parliaments. They are binding immediately. They cannot be repealed by domestic vote. They move beneath the surface of democracy, anchoring policies that no party could campaign on without collapse.
The goal is not consensus. The goal is constraint.
Each directive, framework, or strategy document is a layer. Over time, they form a web. Future governments may win elections, but they inherit a system that has already decided the direction. Courts will intervene if they deviate. Markets will retaliate if they resist. NGOs will shame if they dissent. This is how political conflict is prevented. Not by persuasion. But by pre-emption.
A Class That Cannot Lose
The European Union has created a new professional caste – the permanent administrator. These are not classic bureaucrats. They are mobile, credentialed, fluent in multiple policy dialects, and interchangeable between roles in Brussels, Berlin, Frankfurt, and Geneva. They do not serve a constituency. They serve process.
Their legitimacy comes not from electoral support, but from their mastery of frameworks. They author the ESG guidelines, the gender strategies, the climate targets, the inclusion audits. Their authority is reinforced by a constellation of think tanks, foundations, and accreditation bodies that insulate them from political reversal.
This is not ideology in the traditional sense. It is operational dogma. It does not argue for a worldview. It encodes it.
And once encoded, it becomes invisible. The purpose of the technocratic system is not to win arguments. It is to render argument obsolete.
Voices Without Power
Europeans still vote. They still protest. They still petition. But none of it interrupts the tempo. The source of authority has moved. Elections adjust personalities, not direction.
This is why dissatisfaction no longer maps neatly onto left or right. Farmers revolt in the Netherlands. Suburbs explode in France. Workers strike in Italy. Parents mobilise in Ireland. But the common thread is not ideology. It is exclusion.
People sense that decisions are made somewhere else. That accountability does not exist. That debates are simulated. That law is used as a screen.
When politics is reduced to compliance, resistance begins to move outside the system. Not always rationally. Not always productively. But inevitably.
The Reaction Will Come
The technocratic order cannot suppress politics forever. It can only delay its return.
And when it returns, it will not look like the politics of consensus or institutionalism. It will be rough, asymmetric, and often chaotic. Because when speech is restricted to process, the unspeakable becomes attractive.
Italy will not be alone. Hungary will not be unique. Slovakia, Poland, even Germany will eventually produce governments that see the EU not as a shared home, but as a constraint to manage. The language of cooperation will remain. But the reality will be resistance by another name.
This is not a crisis. It is a correction.
Europe is not in danger because people doubt the system. It is in danger because the system no longer notices people at all. It treats opposition as noise. But the noise is getting louder.
A System That Cannot Hear Will Eventually Be Broken
The restoration of politics begins with limits. Experts must advise, not rule. Courts must interpret, not legislate. Law must bind, not override.
Until this is recognised, the EU will continue to drift. Competent on paper. Directionless in spirit. Its managers will mistake process for legitimacy. And its people, once again, will seek meaning elsewhere.
Technocracy does not fail because it is evil. It fails because it does not listen.
And Europe is already tuning out.