Subscribe
As the European Union continues to wrestle with the inefficiencies hard-wired into its sprawling public procurement regime, Ireland’s latest policy statement on procurement marks a measured but significant national intervention. Rather than attempting a grand overhaul, the Irish approach signals a pragmatic step toward greater accountability and a more coherent use of public funds.
Issued by the Office of Government Procurement (OGP), the policy lays out a comprehensive strategy for modernising the State’s procurement systems. It emphasises sustainability, transparency, and digital integration, framing procurement not simply as a technical process but as a strategic lever for public benefit. These reforms align with broader ECR efforts to rationalise procurement rules across the single market, reflected in the recent adoption of a key report in the European Parliament that called for more flexibility, competition, and technological neutrality.
In a period marked by fiscal pressure, geopolitical instability, and supply chain fragility, Ireland’s reforms represent a targeted response to structural vulnerabilities. They build on the momentum generated by recent enforcement actions and by wider governmental commitments to administrative simplification. Public procurement, representing billions of euro each year, underpins everything from hospital equipment to major transport projects. Yet the system has long been criticised for excessive complexity, limited competition, and opaque procedures that inflate costs and exclude smaller firms.
The OGP policy statement, published in late 2024, situates itself within the lineage of earlier reforms, including the 2013 Capital Review Group’s recommendations and the 2019 National Public Procurement Policy Framework. It also aligns with the aims of the 2023 Better Public Services Transformation agenda. Rather than seeking legislative change, the policy focuses on practical refinements to improve outcomes within the existing EU-compliant framework. This sober approach recognises the constraints of the post-pandemic environment, where supply disruptions and inflation have heightened the need for resilient, adaptable procurement structures.
At the heart of the document is the idea that procurement must be directed toward public value, not box-ticking. Four thematic pillars—strategic procurement, transparency, digitalisation, and informed delivery—chart the path for implementation over the coming decade.
Strategic procurement prioritises the routine use of green public procurement (GPP), particularly in construction, transport, and other high-impact sectors. It also outlines measures to support innovation and broaden access for social enterprises and SMEs, which often struggle to compete with larger firms in tendering processes. Through targeted supports and reserved contracts, the policy attempts to rebalance a playing field historically tilted toward incumbents.
Transparency is framed as a non-negotiable safeguard. The eTenders platform will remain the central repository for all notices above EU thresholds, with plans to expand publication of procurement data through data.gov.ie. Enhanced reporting to international bodies such as the OECD and World Bank aims to benchmark performance against global standards. These measures respond directly to the 2023 European Court of Auditors report, which warned that competition in EU procurement markets is declining, with fewer bidders per tender and a rising share of single-bid procedures. By leveraging data analytics to detect anomalies like bid-rigging, Ireland seeks to reduce opportunities for corruption and malpractice.
Digitalisation forms the most ambitious component of the strategy. Drawing from the Connecting Government 2030 roadmap, the policy envisions a fully electronic procurement ecosystem. The adoption of the “once-only” principle aims to remove duplicated administrative steps, reducing compliance burdens for businesses and public bodies alike. Interoperability with EU systems is expected to expand cross-border access, while investment in core IT infrastructure promises to streamline everything from pre-award evaluation to contract monitoring. These reforms directly address fragmentation and outdated systems that currently hamper efficiency.
The fourth pillar, informed delivery, focuses on adaptability. It commits to ongoing policy iteration, strengthened guidance, and sustained professional development for procurement practitioners. Updated circulars—including new construction management guidelines—will give public bodies more practical tools for compliance, while continued EU advocacy ensures Ireland’s experiences inform the evolving European regulatory landscape.
Civil society scrutiny has reinforced the need for reform. Transparency International Ireland’s submission to the OGP in May 2025 highlighted procurement as one of Europe’s most corruption-exposed domains. They cited domestic lapses, including the exclusion of SMEs and the chronic overruns associated with projects such as the National Children’s Hospital. Procurement analysts have similarly criticised the dominance of the “lowest price” model, which often produces false economies—especially in IT, where artificially cheap bids are followed by high maintenance and integration costs.
Ireland’s procurement reforms do not exist in isolation. They form part of a broader government agenda to reduce bureaucratic burdens. The September 2025 Action Plan on Competitiveness and Productivity aims to eliminate unnecessary reporting obligations and streamline regulatory requirements. A cross-departmental review is projected to save enterprises up to €500 million annually by cutting redundant compliance costs. These reforms are reinforced in the 2025 Programme for Government, which commits to integrating procurement efficiency into public-sector modernisation through investment in digital tools, skills programmes, and lifecycle-based value assessments.
The Better Public Services transformation programme, updated through 2025 newsletters, claims to have “significantly reduced manual workloads” in welfare processing—though precise metrics are still lacking. Within procurement, OGP pilot programmes have trialled simplified tender templates to encourage greater SME participation. The Fourth Open Government Partnership National Action Plan (2023-2025) adds an additional layer of transparency, with enhanced whistleblower protections and improved lobbying regulation indirectly strengthening procurement oversight.
By tackling root causes of inefficiency—data fragmentation, outdated infrastructure, and inconsistent practice—these reforms position Ireland to move toward a more proportionate model of deregulation, one that lowers administrative barriers without weakening oversight. This stands in contrast to more prescriptive approaches elsewhere in the EU and preserves the capacity of local authorities to tailor procurement to regional needs, whether in rural development, housing, or community infrastructure.
At European level, Ireland’s trajectory aligns closely with the ECR Group’s longstanding advocacy for procurement renewal. The ECR-backed own-initiative report led by Polish MEP Piotr Müller, adopted by the Parliament in 2025, calls for reform grounded in technological neutrality, SME access, and digital modernisation. These themes mirror the OGP’s pillars almost point for point. Müller’s report criticises the current directives for creating regulatory barriers that discourage innovation and urges a shift toward risk-tolerant procurement models capable of supporting emerging technologies and circular-economy solutions.
By shaping the legislative mood in Brussels, the ECR has influenced the Commission’s upcoming revisions to the procurement directives slated for 2024–2025. These revisions are expected to incorporate tougher anti-corruption controls, stronger open data requirements, and simplified qualification rules for SMEs. Given that single-bid tenders now account for over 40 per cent of procedures in some sectors, these reforms aim to reverse a worrying decline in competition.
For Ireland, a net contributor to the EU budget, these shifts present clear benefits. Irish SMEs will have improved access to cross-border opportunities, while enhanced oversight reduces wasteful spending, ensuring better value for taxpayers. The OGP strategy commits to pursuing interoperability in eProcurement systems at EU level, potentially reducing administrative costs through standardised data formats and integrated platforms. Both the OGP and ECR initiatives emphasise SME inclusion as the primary hedge against cartelisation, with simplified qualification standards echoing Ireland’s use of reserved contracts for social enterprises.
Real challenges remain. Implementing the digital roadmap will require substantial up-front investment at a time of budgetary constraint. Cultural inertia among procurement officers—many of whom are more familiar with compliance-heavy procedures than with outcome-driven approaches—will require sustained training and leadership. Nonetheless, the direction of travel is clear.
By 2030, the strategy anticipates tangible results: a 30 per cent increase in sustainable procurement, expanded SME participation, and real-time data dashboards providing unprecedented transparency. If delivered, these reforms will reposition procurement not as an administrative burden but as a catalyst for innovation and public value.
Ireland’s procurement modernisation therefore dovetails with the ECR’s broader vision of a more competitive and accountable European marketplace. Both approaches favour deregulation tempered by transparency, decentralised flexibility over centralised control, and the mobilisation of procurement as a tool for economic resilience. For Irish taxpayers, businesses, and communities, the convergence of these agendas offers the prospect of public resources being deployed with greater discipline, clarity, and value in a system long overdue for reform.