Subscribe
On 17 December 2025, the European Parliament formally adopted targeted amendments to the EU Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR), confirming a one-year postponement of its main application dates.
This decision, reached through provisional agreement on 4 December 2025 and endorsed by the Council shortly thereafter, shifts compliance obligations to 30 December 2026 for larger operators and traders, with micro- and small enterprises afforded until 30 June 2027.
Additional refinements include streamlined due diligence procedures, the exclusion of certain printed products from scope due to their minimal deforestation linkage, and provisions for simplified declarations in low-risk contexts.
The EUDR, which entered into force on 29 June 2023, mandates that operators and traders placing specified commodities such as cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soy, and wood, plus derived items on the EU market or exporting them must verify these are deforestation-free (no forest loss after 31 December 2020), legally produced, and accompanied by due diligence statements submitted through the EU Information System.
This system became operational in late 2024, with submissions enabled from December 2024 onward.
The regulation addresses a pressing global challenge: the Food and Agriculture Organization reports that 420 million hectares of forest were lost worldwide between 1990 and 2020, an expanse surpassing the EU’s territory, with EU consumption responsible for roughly 10% of this destruction.
This postponement stands as a notable success for the ECR group, which has long emphasised the regulation’s potential to impose undue strain on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Representing over 99% of EU businesses and providing employment to approximately two-thirds of the workforce, SMEs often navigate intricate, fragmented supply chains for commodities such as cocoa-derived confectionery or rubber components.
The original timeline demanded rapid adoption of sophisticated traceability mechanisms, including precise geolocation data for production plots, risk evaluations, and digital reporting—investments that smaller entities, constrained by limited capital and expertise, struggled to achieve promptly.
The ECR positioned the extension as essential to avert market distortions where SMEs could be marginalised, potentially leading to greater consolidation among larger corporations.
By applying a uniform one-year shift while granting micro- and small operators an extra six months, the amendments foster equitable participation.
This approach acknowledges the diverse capacities across the business landscape, allowing SMEs to develop compliant systems, train staff, and integrate necessary technologies without risking penalties or exclusion from EU markets upon initial enforcement.
Ireland’s Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM), as the nation’s designated Competent Authority, has approached the postponement positively, utilising it to enhance ongoing preparations. DAFM has maintained active stakeholder engagement through sector-specific meetings and direct responses to operator inquiries.
It hosted a webinar on 11 December 2025 to discuss EU developments and the amendments, and provides dedicated commodity-focused contact points for general matters, alongside specialised addresses for cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber, wood products, and soy or palm oil feeds.
Ireland’s involvement in EU bodies, including the Multistakeholder Platform on Deforestation and Council discussions, reflects a proactive stance.
The department views the changes as targeted measures to assist companies, global partners, and member states in effective implementation, aligning with its provision of guidance materials and factsheets tailored for SMEs.
Certain commentators have voiced unease that this adjustment reflects a wider erosion of commitment to rigorous environmental standards, suggesting it stems from resistance to expansive green policies amid competing economic priorities.
These apprehensions, while rooted in a valid concern for sustained progress on ecological issues, do not align with the factual basis for the delay.
The amendments respond directly to identified obstacles, such as ensuring the Information System’s reliability under projected data volumes, reducing redundant administrative layers, and incorporating input from member states and third countries on readiness.
The regulation’s fundamental requirements of prohibiting market access for deforestation-linked products and enforcing due diligence remain unaltered.
Rapporteurs and negotiators have stressed that the “heart” of the EUDR endures, preserving protections for vulnerable forests through the country benchmarking system, which categorizes origins by risk levels.
This represents calibrated governance while upholding ambitious targets, grounding them in practical feasibility.
Hasty application could have resulted in inconsistent enforcement, overburdened systems, or contested outcomes that undermine trust.
Indeed, the EUDR has the capacity to impose severe penalties for non-compliance.
The most severe direct financial consequence is monetary fines. While Member states must impose penalties that are effective, proportionate, and dissuasive, the fines can be at least 4% of the operator’s or trader’s total annual EU-wide turnover in the preceding financial year.
This percentage-based structure hits SMEs particularly hard: for a typical SME with €2-10 million in EU turnover, a fine could range from €80,000 to €400,000 or more, depending on the infringement’s scale, environmental damage, and product value.
Repeated violations may trigger escalating fines, designed to exceed any economic benefit from non-compliance.
Beyond fines, authorities can order confiscation of non-compliant products and any revenues derived from them, leading to immediate inventory losses and forfeited sales. Temporary bans on placing products on the EU market or exporting them disrupt cash flow, while exclusion from public procurement and funding further restricts revenue streams.
Indirect costs compound the impact such as supply chain interruptions from rejected shipments, legal fees, and mandatory corrective actions strain limited resources while reputational damage risks long-term revenue erosion, as consumers and partners increasingly favour compliant suppliers.
For SMEs with thin margins and fewer reserves, these penalties could prove existential, potentially forcing market exit or consolidation. Proactive compliance, though initially costly, mitigates these risks far more effectively than facing enforcement.
Instead, the extended period permits thorough testing, capacity building among authorities, and refined guidance, positioning the regulation for robust, credible operation.
The mandated Commission review by 30 April 2026 will further assess impacts, particularly on smaller operators, potentially proposing additional efficiencies without compromising objectives.
The postponement intersects meaningfully with broader trade dynamics, especially the prospective EU-Mercosur association agreement encompassing Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
These nations supply substantial volumes of EUDR-covered commodities, including beef and soy, frequently associated with land conversion in critical biomes. The Amazon rainforest, spanning much of this region and constituting the planet’s largest tropical forest, has experienced approximately 17-20% loss to date, with cattle pastures occupying significant portions of cleared land.
Research indicates a potential tipping point at 20-25% deforestation, beyond which large-scale, irreversible shift to degraded savanna could occur, releasing vast stored carbon and disrupting regional hydrology and global climate patterns.
Concerns persist that deepened trade ties under Mercosur might intensify pressures on these ecosystems through heightened export demands.
However, the EUDR operates autonomously from trade pacts: imports must independently satisfy deforestation-free criteria, irrespective of preferential tariffs.
The delay fortifies this mechanism by affording time to perfect benchmarking processes, enhance traceability verification, and integrate lessons from pilot implementations.
Rather than clashing with Mercosur aspirations, if the agreement proceeds, the strengthened EUDR incentivises sustainable practices in producing nations, promoting improved governance and supply chain transparency.
This complementary dynamic supports equitable trade that prioritises ecological integrity.
Looking ahead, the coming year offers a valuable window for advancement. Larger entities can refine protocols, SMEs can leverage national supports like Ireland’s DAFM resources, and international collaborators can align with risk classifications.
Continued dialogue via platforms such as the Multistakeholder Forum will prove instrumental.
This postponement exemplifies pragmatic policy refinement that resolute in purpose, attentive to execution.
By bolstering SMEs, resolving operational hurdles, and safeguarding irreplaceable assets like the Amazon, the EU affirms its role in fostering responsible global resource management.
The postponement therefore lays the groundwork for enduring, impactful change.