Subscribe
It was close to midnight in Washington when the world’s attention shifted to the White House. Behind closed doors, Donald Trump welcomed Volodymyr Zelensky and seven European leaders for a summit called on short notice, yet laden with historic weight. Emmanuel Macron, Giorgia Meloni, Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz, Alexander Stubb, Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO’s Mark Rutte sat around the table.
On the agenda: ceasefire, security guarantees, and the possibility of a trilateral encounter with Vladimir Putin. But what the night revealed went far beyond Ukraine. It spoke to the very identity of the West in the 21st century—and whether Europe and America can rediscover the unity that once defined them.
Trump Picks Up the Phone
The moment that electrified the room came unexpectedly. In the middle of deliberations, Trump paused, reached for the phone, and dialed Moscow. For forty minutes he spoke directly with Putin, proposing a bilateral with Zelensky to be followed by a trilateral under U.S. mediation.
The Kremlin later called it “sincere and constructive.” Trump’s own assessment was blunt: “I know what I’m doing. I’ll stop the war. I’ll get it done, like always.”
For American diplomacy, this was a rupture. Decades of careful choreography gave way to a single bold gesture. Whether one sees it as showmanship or statesmanship, the message was clear: the United States is back in the center of the European chessboard.
Meloni’s Moment
If Trump supplied the theatrics, it was Giorgia Meloni who provided the architecture. The Italian Prime Minister arrived with a carefully prepared proposal: NATO-style guarantees for Ukraine, inspired by Article 5 of the Alliance. Not membership, but a shield—binding commitments from Western capitals to come to Kyiv’s defense.
“If we want to guarantee peace, we must do it together, united,” Meloni told the gathering, reminding them that Italy had been the first to float the idea. Trump, visibly impressed, praised her as “a great leader, an inspiration for many.”
For Italy, it was a breakthrough. Long overshadowed by France and Germany, Rome suddenly found itself shaping the debate. Meloni’s conservative realism—pragmatic, security-driven, allergic to rhetorical excess—has allowed Italy to punch far above its traditional diplomatic weight.
Three Themes, One Urgency
The night revolved around three central issues:
- Ceasefire. Macron and Merz insisted that no negotiations could proceed while bombs were still falling. Zelensky nodded but stressed that territorial questions—Crimea, Donbas—must remain matters for direct talks with Moscow.
- Security Guarantees. This was where real progress came. A “Coalition of the Willing,” led by the U.S. and backed by 30 countries, is now being designed to give Ukraine a protective umbrella. The Italian blueprint became the working basis, set to be formalized within ten days.
- The War Economy. Zelensky unveiled a $90 billion package: U.S. weapons financed by European funds, plus a deal for producing drones on Ukrainian soil. More than procurement, it signaled a fusion of Ukraine’s defense industry with the West.
Alongside these pillars, the humanitarian tragedy was not ignored. Ursula von der Leyen demanded the return of Ukrainian children deported to Russia. “Every single child must be brought back to their family,” she declared.
The Conservative Argument: Strength Before Justice
For Meloni and Trump, the order of priorities was clear: first security, then justice. “Justice and security go together,” Meloni noted, “but security must come first—because without security, there can be no justice.”
It was a conservative formulation, pragmatic rather than utopian. Where some European voices dream of perfect settlements, Rome and Washington insist on hard guarantees.
Why Unity Matters
The deeper lesson of the night was one the West has struggled to learn: unity is not optional. The past three and a half years have been marked by divisions—Germany’s hesitations, France’s solo initiatives, Washington’s internal political battles. Each fracture emboldened the Kremlin.
Meloni’s words cut through: “We must explore every possible solution to guarantee peace, justice, and the security of our nations.”
For too long, Europe toyed with “strategic autonomy” while leaning on American firepower. The result was ambiguity. Trump’s re-entry into the diplomatic arena ends that illusion. Either Europe aligns firmly with Washington to secure Ukraine, or it risks fading into irrelevance.
Echoes of History
The summit brought to mind earlier turning points. Reykjavik, 1986, when Reagan and Gorbachev’s direct dialogue opened the path to ending the Cold War. Trump’s phone call to Putin may not carry the same grandeur, but the impulse was similar: boldness over bureaucracy.
There was also the spirit of the Marshall Plan. Then, America mobilized economic might to rebuild Europe. Today, it contemplates vast investment—military and industrial—to anchor Ukraine in the Western system. The $90 billion package discussed in Washington is the embryo of such a strategy.
Europe’s Existential Stakes
For Europeans, the war is not a distant crisis but a question of survival. Macron spoke of halting the killings, Merz of the need for credibility, Starmer of the link between Ukraine’s security and Britain’s own. Beneath the national accents was a common fear: if Ukraine falls, no European border is truly secure.
That is why Meloni’s call for unity resonated. A divided West is a vulnerable West; a united West is itself a deterrent.
Putin’s Calculations
In Moscow, Putin has long counted on Western fatigue. Democracies, he wagered, would tire of war before Russia exhausted itself. The Washington summit complicates that calculus. A credible Western security guarantee for Ukraine would force him into a dilemma: negotiate seriously, or confront a consolidated alliance.
Perhaps that is why the Kremlin described Trump’s call as “constructive.” The winds may be shifting.
America’s Conservative Moment
Seen through a conservative lens, Washington’s midnight gamble underscored a timeless principle: peace requires strength. Trump’s realism—that Ukraine may not join NATO soon but must still be shielded—is prudence, not weakness. Meloni’s push for NATO-style commitments is deterrence, not escalation.
Together they sketch a foreign policy vision rooted in realism, solidarity, and national responsibility. It is a contrast to progressive idealism on one side and isolationist retreat on the other. And it may yet provide the framework for ending Europe’s bloodiest war in decades.
The War Does Not Wait
Even as leaders debated in Washington, missiles and drones struck Kremenchuk and Kharkiv. Air raid sirens sounded across Ukraine. The war’s brutality was a reminder: peace is not a luxury but an urgent necessity.
Toward August
The next milestone may come sooner than expected. Talks are underway to arrange a direct meeting between Putin and Zelensky before the end of August. If it happens, it will be rooted in the night when Trump picked up the phone, Meloni laid out a plan, and Europe rediscovered the weight of unity.
A Night to Be Remembered
What happened in Washington may not end the war tomorrow. But it changed the atmosphere: it made peace thinkable again. It reminded the West of its strength when united, and it forced Moscow to recalculate. If history is written by decisive moments, this midnight gamble may stand as one of them—a night when America and Europe, led by conservative clarity, redrew the map of peace.
Beyond the symbolism, the summit also left a roadmap. Within days, officials will hammer out the framework for security guarantees; within weeks, Trump aims to bring Putin and Zelensky face-to-face. And within months, the West must prove it can translate promises into lasting commitments. That sequence of deadlines makes this more than a diplomatic show—it makes Washington’s midnight meeting the hinge on which Europe’s future may turn.